Referee's letter back to the Editorial Office
REVIEW PAGE ONE:
Editorial Office Only
European Journal of Bioenergetic Analysis and Therapy (EJBAT)
Manuscript No:
Version:
Manuscript Title:
Author:
Category:
Date Sent:
Date Due:
Referee:
RECOMMENDATIONS: Choose Only One
- ACCEPT (ready for publication with no further revisions)
- ACCEPT WITH REVISION (AWR) should be published in EJBAT,even if it needs
revision)
- Minor
- Moderate
- Extensive
- This article should commented by an editor or expert
- Who would you recommend?
- I would like to write the comment
- RECONSIDER AFTER REVISION (scientific quality is in doubt, critical data
are missing or the writing is so poor as to compromise interpretation)
- REJECT (to be checked if no amout of revision will result in a publishing manuscript)
- Insufficient New Information
- Poor Study Design or Conduct
- Inappropriate for Bioenergetics
- Inadequate Educational Value or Content (Case Reports, Revieuws ect.)
STATISTICS:
- Presentation of statistical data correct
- Statistical consultation by expert required?
- Statistical Data Presentation inappropriate of insufficient
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
- I view myself as an academic competitor of the author. Please provide
information regarding this / and or others below:
- I will revieuw the revisted manuscript
Please Provide Your Narrative Comments regarding this manuscript on an other
page and Fax to: 0031-70-3832828 or contact the editor by e-mail
Regina Axt